Talks within the ITREWN about a possible name change
The International Treaty of Ensuring World Integrity (ITREWN) is considering a name change due to concerns that its current moniker is too complex and lacks immediate impact. Some member-states have proposed alternative names, while others argue for preserving the established name.
Article by: Emory Bowers, DPN International Section Correspondent
The International Treaty of Ensuring World Integrity (ITREWN) is exploring a potential name change. General Secretary Jones Ferran, along with various representatives from member-states, recently discussed the possibility during a high-level meeting.
The debate stems from concerns that the current name is overly complex and lacks immediate impact. Some member-states have proposed alternative names that aim to capture the essence of unity and global cooperation fostered by the ITREWN while maintaining a sense of power and authority. Other representatives, however, argue against changing the established name, emphasizing its historical significance and recognition among Welloterrians.
The final decision on whether or not to change ITREWN’s name will be made following further discussions and consultations. The proposed alternatives remain confidential for now, but are expected to be revealed in the future.
